Search Results
Search results 1-20 of 29.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
exactly what i said
-
Quote from Mih0: “@MeLarie I see now that this is an old thread from June, don’t know why it was pinned. As to new military tech, top investment goes to: 1. Laser weapons (AA) 2. Drones (attack drones, spy drones, single use drones) - but you have that covered 3.spy satellites - russia, china and USA are rushing to make and shoot these. 4. Hypersonic rockets/planes 5. Surface and submarine naval drones Then there are the infantry concepts that the top armies are investing in: 1. hit and run ATGM…
-
and it is pretty annoying to know that once landed air assault troops have to walk to reach their next destination if there is no airfield nearby, if they are cmbat recon vehicles in the air assault unit, the speed should be increased to the same as mtorized infantry so i dn't have to wait days for my air assault unit to reach a province. it would relly get me into using air assault units more
-
i will say it again, paratroopers should be implemented to th egame as well as supply routes that the player chooses, paratroopers would have greater range and would be mre effective than air assault(if the enemy does not have anti air) and supply routes would add more realism. The should impact effectiveness and hp and soldiers could die of hunger if not supplied. u could be surrounded by enemy provinces meaning that u can't be supplied and have to breakthrough enemy lines in order to do so. su…
-
and after the season if paratroopers do become an elite unit they should become regular units
-
Hypersonic Air to air missiles cuz dog fights are rare in modern day
-
or supply trucks which can supply troops if connected with a city with 15 hp, they could affect effectiveness of troops and if the unit that supply trucks surrounded by enemy provinces can't provide food and stuff but are air transpotable so building a airbase would allow for this and can be transported by sea, this would make the game more realistic
-
1. it would be a good addition because paratroopers can do what air assault can but with greater effectiveness 2. They can be regular unit not special forces so they can capture land like air assault and should be able to seize airfields without destroying them 3. It would add another dimension, and can still be used as units like 82nd and173rd show
-
what about paratroopers which are faster and have more range of deployment than air assault
-
Hey as a suggestion, i feel the need for supply lines as it would had much more depth to the game. For example you can be surrounded and cut off meaning you would not have food, fuel and other resources and could affect the effectiveness of the troops. and if cutoff you could build a airbase to supply troops and while conducting a amphibious invasion you could be supplied by the sea if the enemy navy does not cut off the supply line. You could had supply units to the game with 15 hp it would mak…
-
If they had vehicles like special forces that would be great. I hate the fact that airfields are destroyed when occupied. If there is no battle in the province the airfied should not be destroyed. Special forces need to be able to occupy airfields By the way paratroopers are not outdated. For example in th 2003 invation of Iraq. Paratroopers were dropped in Operation nothern delay. The same the french did in mali. 82nd airbonrne! It would be great for rapid intervention. Besides planes have grea…
-
what do you mean. Do you agree?
-
I am currently playing a red vs blue game. The problem is when I liberate other allied coutries. I can't build airbases. I believe that if a country is liberated . The liberators should have some power. Only for building stuff.