Currently in the game, you only have ICBMs, nuclear ballistic missiles, and nuclear cruise missiles. How about adding different ones, for example, a B83 for the Western research doctrine, an RDS-37 for Eastern, and the Yellow Sun/Red Snow for the European doctrine. These would be delivered through heavy bombers, and would be considerably more powerful than the missiles. Thoughts?
Another level of nuclear weapons past ICBM?
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
thanoscar21 wrote:
Currently in the game, you only have ICBMs, nuclear ballistic missiles, and nuclear cruise missiles. How about adding different ones, for example, a B83 for the Western research doctrine, an RDS-37 for Eastern, and the Yellow Sun/Red Snow for the European doctrine. These would be delivered through heavy bombers, and would be considerably more powerful than the missiles. Thoughts?
*** The Creator of Zombie Farming ***
The KING of CoN News!!!
The "Get off my lawn!" cranky CoN Forums Poster - not affiliated with Dorado in any way
"Death comes to us all. Shall I deal you in?" - DoD -
I fail to see what role this new missile would fill in the game the way it is currently structured:
Cruise and Ballistic missiles can be conventional, chemical or nuclear. Ballistic have stronger stats then cruise but can only be aimed at city/province centers.
ICBM have the strongest stats in the game can only be nukes and be aimed at city/province centers.
What you propose is another type of missile even stronger then ICBMs , my question is what for? -
corax wrote:
I fail to see what role this new missile would fill in the game the way it is currently structured:
Cruise and Ballistic missiles can be conventional, chemical or nuclear. Ballistic have stronger stats then cruise but can only be aimed at city/province centers.
ICBM have the strongest stats in the game can only be nukes and be aimed at city/province centers.
What you propose is another type of missile even stronger then ICBMs , my question is what for?
The problem with this idea is that it would break the game for small nations. I could wipe out many nations with a couple missiles, whereas the big nations, esp Russia/America/China, would have little more to fear from the new missile as the current ICBM. -
so what you say is that we need a weapon to surpass
metal gearICBMs?I am The Baseline for opinions -
thanoscar21 wrote:
These would be delivered through heavy bombers, and would be considerably more powerful than the missiles.
Because... I don't really like the sound of that very much. -
So like you want the equivalent of a nuclear bomber in CoW? In compensation for it to be easier to be shot down, you want it to be more buffed?
-
Pyth0n wrote:
So like you want the equivalent of a nuclear bomber in CoW? In compensation for it to be easier to be shot down, you want it to be more buffed?
I guess they could make it so you have a single bomber that can't be grouped, but give it like 50 HP or something? -
corax wrote:
I fail to see what role this new missile would fill in the game the way it is currently structured:
Cruise and Ballistic missiles can be conventional, chemical or nuclear. Ballistic have stronger stats then cruise but can only be aimed at city/province centers.
ICBM have the strongest stats in the game can only be nukes and be aimed at city/province centers.
What you propose is another type of missile even stronger then ICBMs , my question is what for?
-
WalterChang wrote:
thanoscar21 wrote:
These would be delivered through heavy bombers, and would be considerably more powerful than the missiles.
Because... I don't really like the sound of that very much.
-
thanoscar21 wrote:
Currently in the game, you only have ICBMs, nuclear ballistic missiles, and nuclear cruise missiles. How about adding different ones, for example, a B83 for the Western research doctrine, an RDS-37 for Eastern, and the Yellow Sun/Red Snow for the European doctrine. These would be delivered through heavy bombers, and would be considerably more powerful than the missiles. Thoughts?
-
Dealer of Death wrote:
thanoscar21 wrote:
Currently in the game, you only have ICBMs, nuclear ballistic missiles, and nuclear cruise missiles. How about adding different ones, for example, a B83 for the Western research doctrine, an RDS-37 for Eastern, and the Yellow Sun/Red Snow for the European doctrine. These would be delivered through heavy bombers, and would be considerably more powerful than the missiles. Thoughts?
-
WalterChang wrote:
thanoscar21 wrote:
These would be delivered through heavy bombers, and would be considerably more powerful than the missiles.
Because... I don't really like the sound of that very much.
-
Maybe it could work like UGVs where you have to build the equipment for it first, only in this case you'd have to build a certain amount of nuclear warheads first. This might not be the best idea, but it shouldn't be too easily dismissed. I would rather have EMPs that would wipe out a city's economy and damage troops, but not inflict any casualties.
-
EMPs would be cool
-
But in reality what is beyond a ICBM. Which imho shouldn't even be in game as no one has used in a war in 70 yrs."And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him "
aka ...The killer formerly known as BuckeyeChamp -
Buckeyechamp wrote:
But in reality what is beyond a ICBM. Which imho shouldn't even be in game as no one has used in a war in 70 yrs.
*** The Creator of Zombie Farming ***
The KING of CoN News!!!
The "Get off my lawn!" cranky CoN Forums Poster - not affiliated with Dorado in any way
"Death comes to us all. Shall I deal you in?" - DoD -
Dealer of Death wrote:
Buckeyechamp wrote:
But in reality what is beyond a ICBM. Which imho shouldn't even be in game as no one has used in a war in 70 yrs.
And Atomic bombs dropped less power than todays conventional MOABs or a nuke CM. Firebombing of Tokyo killed way more than both Nukes combined."And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him "
aka ...The killer formerly known as BuckeyeChamp -
Buckeyechamp wrote:
Dealer of Death wrote:
Buckeyechamp wrote:
But in reality what is beyond a ICBM. Which imho shouldn't even be in game as no one has used in a war in 70 yrs.
And Atomic bombs dropped less power than todays conventional MOABs or a nuke CM. Firebombing of Tokyo killed way more than both Nukes combined.
*** The Creator of Zombie Farming ***
The KING of CoN News!!!
The "Get off my lawn!" cranky CoN Forums Poster - not affiliated with Dorado in any way
"Death comes to us all. Shall I deal you in?" - DoD -
I know.. but just brought up point why nuke icbms shouldn't be part of game."And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him "
aka ...The killer formerly known as BuckeyeChamp