KFGauss wrote:
Z - I was asking about your description of US military strategy - It seemed odd.
But as I said US is not good example at all for CoN air-ground warfare.
They were involved in so many wars but after Vietnam all those wars were not a challenge to them. They prepared every single war for a decade and chosen "enemies" didn't have strong army especially airforce and AA.
It is so obvious except if you learn from Hollywood movies about US warfare.
Even Vietnam was not nearly equal to the US but had hudge help from allies.
Which eventually led to defeat for US.
After that war they never tried to invade strong enough country.
As @Kalrakh said:
"The so called 'world police' turned into a bully".
Now I don't want to argue about that, it doesn't matter what both of us think about "US world policing".
I just responded to that US air superiority military strategy is good example for game warfare.
It can only be good example if we compare new userxxx who log in once per day with some very experienced and active player who is almost all the time online and golding a little bit.
Ofc this experienced user will achieve air dominance in game. Ofc US can achieve air dominance against Irak after decade of economic sanctions and decade long war Irak previously had.
But can the US achieve air superiority over China?
That would be proper example for game warfare.
Btw we were talking about how strong are planes in CoN, sorry but we are now off topic with this.