No.I am The Baseline for opinions
There are many unplayable nations in Conflict of Nations. You can see them in every continent. In Europe, there is one example - Slovakia. City Ideas for the nation: 1. Bratislava - capital, 2. Košice - the second largest city, 3. Žilina, 4. Trenčín, 5. Nitra, 6. Banská Bystrica, 7. Prešov, 8. Trnava. There are smaller countries with less population which are playable. There are also many more unplayable nations in Europe, for example Moldova, Switzerland, Belgium and Netherlands. This is only in Europe. I noticed Somalia in Africa is also not playable anymore. The game developers add nations which do not even exist, like Uyghur, which belongs to China. They should focus in making unplayable nations playable. In that case, they should allow players to make larger alliances with like 10 or more members. This will also make the game more realistic.
As for larger coalitions (10+) would be a really bad idea. I typically join games with 4 other members from my alliance and we rarely lose games (I cannot recall the last game I joined with 4 other alliance members and lost). Allowing 10+ allies would make it even easier for alliances to dominate public matches. I actually think it would be better to decrease the amount of allies to 3 or 4 for typical WW3 maps. A coordinated alliance using discord already has a massive advantage over 5 random players. Why permit the alliance to have even more players join the map.
In Europe, there is one example - Slovakia. City Ideas for the nation: 1. Bratislava - capital, 2. Košice - the second largest city, 3. Žilina, 4. Trenčín, 5. Nitra, 6. Banská Bystrica, 7. Prešov, 8. Trnava.
@Andilek7319 and @RadioActive) who would support this idea, and if you want to see more "powerful" AI countries, go play Call of War."CoN is a game of 80% skill and 20% luck" - Tifo_14
"I don't get paid enough to do anything" - Germanico
Nothing stops the Tifo
Smaller countries can be united in large European coalitions and it will be more realistic since there is no limit in real life, like someone will say you only 5 members. Also you do not have to remove any nation, just make more nations playable. There are 100 nations in that 2050 world games, which are playable and do not even exist.
Also, the proposal of more nations added to the regular WW3 game does not make sense when half the nations already go inactive within 3 days. It just creates more AI territories to conquer (which is not fun).
I feel like you have not really thought through this plan and dreaming of a hypothetical world where half the games are not filled with new players that abandon the game instantly after joining.