Red vs Blue

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Red vs Blue

      This map/game mode is ridiculous. You enter only to be surrounded by inactive players/newbs looking at them how the troops just stay there and do nothing while you have to fight. At least on a regular map, inactives are a source of expansion and resources which ultimately lead to became stronger. But this is plain stupid. Not to mention what is means here a multi account. To be able to see ALL the enemy countries

      I can understand the idea but it is simply not applicable, unless you make sure all the players play
    • ovy7825 wrote:

      This map/game mode is ridiculous. You enter only to be surrounded by inactive players/newbs looking at them how the troops just stay there and do nothing while you have to fight. At least on a regular map, inactives are a source of expansion and resources which ultimately lead to became stronger. But this is plain stupid. Not to mention what is means here a multi account. To be able to see ALL the enemy countries

      I can understand the idea but it is simply not applicable, unless you make sure all the players play
      cry about it
      I may or may not exist
    • ovy7825 wrote:

      This map/game mode is ridiculous. You enter only to be surrounded by inactive players/newbs looking at them how the troops just stay there and do nothing while you have to fight. At least on a regular map, inactives are a source of expansion and resources which ultimately lead to became stronger. But this is plain stupid. Not to mention what is means here a multi account. To be able to see ALL the enemy countries

      I can understand the idea but it is simply not applicable, unless you make sure all the players play
      What do you suggest to accomplish this, shock collars, or bamboo splints under the fingernails?
      *** The Creator of Zombie Farming ***
      The KING of CoN News!!!
      The "Get off my lawn!" cranky CoN Forums Poster - not affiliated with Dorado in any way


      "Death comes to us all. Shall I deal you in?" - DoD
    • Dealer of Death wrote:

      ovy7825 wrote:

      This map/game mode is ridiculous. You enter only to be surrounded by inactive players/newbs looking at them how the troops just stay there and do nothing while you have to fight. At least on a regular map, inactives are a source of expansion and resources which ultimately lead to became stronger. But this is plain stupid. Not to mention what is means here a multi account. To be able to see ALL the enemy countries

      I can understand the idea but it is simply not applicable, unless you make sure all the players play
      What do you suggest to accomplish this, shock collars, or bamboo splints under the fingernails?
      good ideas, maybe one of those bear trap helmets from saw
      I may or may not exist
    • Dealer of Death wrote:

      ovy7825 wrote:

      This map/game mode is ridiculous. You enter only to be surrounded by inactive players/newbs looking at them how the troops just stay there and do nothing while you have to fight. At least on a regular map, inactives are a source of expansion and resources which ultimately lead to became stronger. But this is plain stupid. Not to mention what is means here a multi account. To be able to see ALL the enemy countries

      I can understand the idea but it is simply not applicable, unless you make sure all the players play
      What do you suggest to accomplish this, shock collars, or bamboo splints under the fingernails?
      Of course i don't mean actually forcing anyone

      - Players marked as inactive should be kicked from the alliance so they can be conquered and so got rid of
      - Restrict player level by a bit
    • ovy7825 wrote:

      Dealer of Death wrote:

      ovy7825 wrote:

      This map/game mode is ridiculous. You enter only to be surrounded by inactive players/newbs looking at them how the troops just stay there and do nothing while you have to fight. At least on a regular map, inactives are a source of expansion and resources which ultimately lead to became stronger. But this is plain stupid. Not to mention what is means here a multi account. To be able to see ALL the enemy countries

      I can understand the idea but it is simply not applicable, unless you make sure all the players play
      What do you suggest to accomplish this, shock collars, or bamboo splints under the fingernails?
      Of course i don't mean actually forcing anyone
      - Players marked as inactive should be kicked from the alliance so they can be conquered and so got rid of
      - Restrict player level by a bit
      yes, rank 30 or something
    • Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
    • Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      Україна
      Україна

      "The future is not written" - Anna Jija
    • Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      All Shall Eventually Fall
    • LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      no

      especially not if you are going solo
      Україна
      Україна

      "The future is not written" - Anna Jija
    • Anna Jija wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      no
      especially not if you are going solo
      Using your logic, it's unfair for 5 alliance players to join a regular game and wipe everyone else out as it doesn't give the opposing players a chance
      All Shall Eventually Fall
    • LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      noespecially not if you are going solo
      Using your logic, it's unfair for 5 alliance players to join a regular game and wipe everyone else out as it doesn't give the opposing players a chance
      But other people can also form their own coalitions???

      I don't see the problem here?
      "Dealer of Death has counted to infinity... twice"
      -Kurtvonstein
    • Second Cannae wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      noespecially not if you are going solo
      Using your logic, it's unfair for 5 alliance players to join a regular game and wipe everyone else out as it doesn't give the opposing players a chance
      But other people can also form their own coalitions???
      I don't see the problem here?
      that's exactly my point
      All Shall Eventually Fall
    • LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      noespecially not if you are going solo
      Using your logic, it's unfair for 5 alliance players to join a regular game and wipe everyone else out as it doesn't give the opposing players a chance
      It is .. read wolf packing rule.
      "And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him "

      aka ...The killer formerly known as BuckeyeChamp
    • Buckeyechamp wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      noespecially not if you are going solo
      Using your logic, it's unfair for 5 alliance players to join a regular game and wipe everyone else out as it doesn't give the opposing players a chance
      It is .. read wolf packing rule.
      No, that's only if there are more players than the coalition size, 5 players = 1 coalition
      All Shall Eventually Fall
    • LastLiving wrote:

      Buckeyechamp wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      LastLiving wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      Clock wrote:

      Anna Jija wrote:

      joined a rvb game and discovered an alliance was wolfpacking.

      so, day 10ish they have all americans + most of africa, and invade europe. i was australia, by the time i could do much, game was over

      kurtvonstein wrote:

      how can a alliance wolfpack? Did they jpon both teams and then players from 1 team surrender or helped the other?
      Yes, how can they wolfpack? The game is meant to be played in teams. The only way I can see it being unfair is like @kurtvonstein wrote that if they both joined separate teams and then 1 side surrendered or helped the other in some way.
      so having 10 players from same alliance join a game and then wipe out everyone else is 'fair'? It doesnt give anyone else a chance
      So it's not fair for 10 competent players to join the same team? No rules broken.
      noespecially not if you are going solo
      Using your logic, it's unfair for 5 alliance players to join a regular game and wipe everyone else out as it doesn't give the opposing players a chance
      It is .. read wolf packing rule.
      No, that's only if there are more players than the coalition size, 5 players = 1 coalition
      or multiple people from alliance joining same public game
      "And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him "

      aka ...The killer formerly known as BuckeyeChamp
    • No, in order for it to be a violation of the Wolfpacking rule, more members of an Alliance have to join a game than slots in a coalition. Meaning:

      WW3 - 5 OK, 6 no
      FP & BG USA - 3 OK, 4 no
      *** The Creator of Zombie Farming ***
      The KING of CoN News!!!
      The "Get off my lawn!" cranky CoN Forums Poster - not affiliated with Dorado in any way


      "Death comes to us all. Shall I deal you in?" - DoD