I don't know why you guys insist on using national guard. They're too weak and till you have a good airforce or good artillery you have to rely on melee face it.
"National guard is good" my ass
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
The whole point of them is being cheap and fast to mobilize and do good enough against insurgents.
My first aircraft is produced by day 3-4, if I want to fight early on CRV covers that role one good enough until then.
Also, I'm pretty sure there already was a thread on this topic so I really don't see why you had to create a new one?I am The Baseline for opinions -
Teburu wrote:
The whole point of them is being cheap and fast to mobilize and do good enough against insurgents.
My first aircraft is produced by day 3-4, if I want to fight early on CRV covers that role one good enough until then.
Also, I'm pretty sure there already was a thread on this topic so I really don't see why you had to create a new one?
-
shrek6satan wrote:
Teburu wrote:
The whole point of them is being cheap and fast to mobilize and do good enough against insurgents.
My first aircraft is produced by day 3-4, if I want to fight early on CRV covers that role one good enough until then.
Also, I'm pretty sure there already was a thread on this topic so I really don't see why you had to create a new one?
I am The Baseline for opinions -
Can i just answer "lmao" ?Running an online alliance is pretty much like running a small company, except you need to find other way than money to keep your employees productive. May they play or work, they are humans.
-
NG is meant to hold / defend cities and you do not need melee unless attacked. Build Bunker 1 and can spin up 3 NG per city day 1 they will defend quite a bit with 50 pct Def bonus in cities. Plus day 1 you still usually have like 12 INf and frees them up so whats the issue.
Day 1 go after AI nations and can soften up/defeat the 1 NG unit AI has with your 1 free ASF. Build a second one etc until can get SF; 2 - 3 ASF make a poor mans SF"And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him "
aka ...The killer formerly known as BuckeyeChamp -
I'm not sure what do you expect to defend before u have better units than infantry u say early I need infantry to defend.
u r defending against other infantry too!!
and well this unit has defense bonuses making it comparable to other infantry (in defending infantry) for less cost and 1/3 of the building time
the only problem is upkeep cost is somewhat high but still fine
this unit is legendary
CON has a style that unit ain't equal and not totally balanced not all units have a role at all some units is a must build and other are NEVER good
ng is of the former and motorized is of the later I can't see any situation whatever it is real or imaginable where motorized have any sort of value over ng -
National guard are dog u tripping on balls
-
CinnamonStick wrote:
National guard are dog u tripping on balls
@Dorado If you Close the Forum and move everything to Discord you will lose my Feedback for sure. -
kurtvonstein wrote:
CinnamonStick wrote:
National guard are dog u tripping on balls
-
-
Oh I see why u gotta be so toxic
-
Ok I will elaborate
National Guard are not as advanced as other types of infantry. I personally have never seen a good use for them. Not to say they don’t have a good use I just have never experienced those conditions. -
found any of his posts? He is either on vacation or @Dealer of Death scared him away.@Dorado If you Close the Forum and move everything to Discord you will lose my Feedback for sure.
-
-
Nah I just saw something in types of users
-
well you have a good point maybe I’ll stop focusing as much in infantry but they are good for defense
-
-
Ok fair enough I clearly need some changes to my strategy
-
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Similar Threads