Flat Stanley wrote:
I did this kind of conservatively but here goes
Screenshot 2022-09-15 10.15.54.png
PS: helos are cr@p, heavies are cr@p, strikes/asf/stealth = KING

National Guards Should Not Be Underestimated 

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
Flat Stanley wrote:
I did this kind of conservatively but here goes
Screenshot 2022-09-15 10.15.54.png
PS: helos are cr@p, heavies are cr@p, strikes/asf/stealth = KING
Flat Stanley wrote:
I did this kind of conservatively but here goes
Screenshot 2022-09-15 10.15.54.png
PS: helos are cr@p, heavies are cr@p, strikes/asf/stealth = KING
japan samurai wrote:
guess you’re just trolling then…Flat Stanley wrote:
I did this [putting 3 infantries plus a submarine among the best]
Zozo001 wrote:
What gave that away??japan samurai wrote:
guess you’re just trolling then…Flat Stanley wrote:
I did this [putting 3 infantries plus a submarine among the best]
Opulon wrote:
"awacs is trash" also is a give away
oh, and "aicraft carriers are good" is something you can keep for a comedic stand up.
Flat Stanley wrote:
@japan samurai I fyou dont have anything nice to say please just shut the f*ck up. you have been trolling me for a few days now and i dont like it
The post was edited 4 times, last by japan samurai ().
japan samurai wrote:
Buff for airbornes!!
Honestly stats for SPF and Mech and AM is abit weird on the number of casualties it will cause when destroyed. Like they are elite units, why must the outnumeber their opponents to do more damage then people like say Mot inf.
And how does 100 men (insurgents) get to kill like 280+- well trained motorized infrantry men?
Flat Stanley wrote:
All heavies belong in bottom 2 rows.
The post was edited 1 time, last by The Pale Rider ().