"Success is not final, Failure is NOT fatal. I DON'T CARE if your sick, I DON'T CARE what your going through, if you're not dead, he ain't through you yet. As long as you're alive you CAN STILL MAKE IT HAPPEN. As long as there's breath in your nostrils, boo, you're still in the game, you still can win."
Tierlist of Units in CoN
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
Objections:
Mot Inf to Good or Decent
MBT to Bad
ACs to Decent
Destroyers to Decent or Bad
HBs to Decent
M. Radar to Great
TDs to Good
Cruisers to Good or Great
CRVs to Good
UAVs to Decent
T. Arty to Good/Great
At. Subs to Decent/Good
BM Subs to Good
Attack Helis to Great
Gunships to Great
NPA to Good
Corvettes to Decent/Good
ASW Helis to Decent
AWACS to Good"War does not determine who is right; only who is left."
Always strive to be better
Don't try and be the best
A better world is always within out fingertips
But Utopia just causes more stress. -
-
lol no
terrible tierlist
only thing it shows is that you dont know shit about conI am The Baseline for opinions -
It's quite a nice little tool for people to share their opinions, however ill-informed they are.
But it is missing the Elite Attack Aircraft - which makes a big difference at the moment. -
-
Nawacs should have their own tier at the very bottom tho
also: dont put melee above B tier;
a general tierlist would roughly be:
S: units that are highly specialized and also require specialized units to counter
eg: SAMs, MRL
in general hardcounters tend to belong into this category
A: units that are solid choices but a lot easier to counter eg: sf or cruise missiles
B: think melee, but units that dont get fucked over that badly by terrain; afv comes to mind, maybe TD with air assault
C: MBT and similar
inf in general would be ranked like B-C, with the exception of specops being A-SI am The Baseline for opinions -
PaskalSF wrote:
First of all: SINCE WHEN NATIONAL GUARDS SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS GREAT??!!
Yes, they are perfect at handling cities but, SERIOUSLY, classifying them as great is a pain in the ass, i think they should be classified as decent or good AS THEY ARE TERRIBLE IN ADVANCING AGAINST OTHER UNITS! (Not talking about insurgents here.)
Second: Since when towed artillery is classified as BAD?? Towed artillery is perfect for small countries and very good for offline defenses or as a support unit (AND THAT IS IT'S FUNCTION!)
Third: Frigates should NEVER be classified as GREAT, (I have to confess that i use them too to make heavy air defense covers in important cities as long as with SAM turrets.) AND when the days pass and players get stronger ships, they become almost USELESS in ship by ship COMBAT! They should be classified as good or decent.National Guards Should Not Be UnderestimatedThe post was edited 3 times, last by KoopKoopyGuy ().
-
KoopKoopyGuy wrote:
PaskalSF wrote:
First of all: SINCE WHEN NATIONAL GUARDS SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS GREAT??!!
Yes, they are perfect at handling cities but, SERIOUSLY, classifying them as great is a pain in the ass, i think they should be classified as decent or good AS THEY ARE TERRIBLE IN ADVANCING AGAINST OTHER UNITS! (Not talking about insurgents here.)
Second: Since when towed artillery is classified as BAD?? Towed artillery is perfect for small countries and very good for offline defenses or as a support unit (AND THAT IS IT'S FUNCTION!)
Third: Frigates should NEVER be classified as GREAT, (I have to confess that i use them too to make heavy air defense covers in important cities as long as with SAM turrets.) AND when the days pass and players get stronger ships, they become almost USELESS in ship by ship COMBAT! They should be classified as good or decent.
That the list he posed is worthless is kinda obviousI am The Baseline for opinions -
Teburu wrote:
KoopKoopyGuy wrote:
PaskalSF wrote:
First of all: SINCE WHEN NATIONAL GUARDS SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS GREAT??!!
Yes, they are perfect at handling cities but, SERIOUSLY, classifying them as great is a pain in the ass, i think they should be classified as decent or good AS THEY ARE TERRIBLE IN ADVANCING AGAINST OTHER UNITS! (Not talking about insurgents here.)
Second: Since when towed artillery is classified as BAD?? Towed artillery is perfect for small countries and very good for offline defenses or as a support unit (AND THAT IS IT'S FUNCTION!)
Third: Frigates should NEVER be classified as GREAT, (I have to confess that i use them too to make heavy air defense covers in important cities as long as with SAM turrets.) AND when the days pass and players get stronger ships, they become almost USELESS in ship by ship COMBAT! They should be classified as good or decent.
That the list he posed is worthless is kinda obvious
About this guy, seeing some of his forums he has posted many misinformations already, i really think he should start experiencing getting out of the caves, or if he doesn't know about a certain subject then he shouldn't be talking about it.National Guards Should Not Be UnderestimatedThe post was edited 1 time, last by KoopKoopyGuy ().
-
Every "Tool" has its purpose.
These are tools of war; is a screw driver better than a hammer? Well we all know Duct Tape is way OP; besides that select the right tool to meet your objectives / situation."And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him "
aka ...The killer formerly known as BuckeyeChamp -
The Pale Rider wrote:
Every "Tool" has its purpose.
These are tools of war; is a screw driver better than a hammer? Well we all know Duct Tape is way OP; besides that select the right tool to meet your objectives / situation.
National Guards Should Not Be Underestimated -
KoopKoopyGuy wrote:
PaskalSF wrote:
First of all: SINCE WHEN NATIONAL GUARDS SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS GREAT??!!
Yes, they are perfect at handling cities but, SERIOUSLY, classifying them as great is a pain in the ass, i think they should be classified as decent or good AS THEY ARE TERRIBLE IN ADVANCING AGAINST OTHER UNITS! (Not talking about insurgents here.)
Second: Since when towed artillery is classified as BAD?? Towed artillery is perfect for small countries and very good for offline defenses or as a support unit (AND THAT IS IT'S FUNCTION!)
Third: Frigates should NEVER be classified as GREAT, (I have to confess that i use them too to make heavy air defense covers in important cities as long as with SAM turrets.) AND when the days pass and players get stronger ships, they become almost USELESS in ship by ship COMBAT! They should be classified as good or decent.
"Success is not final, Failure is NOT fatal. I DON'T CARE if your sick, I DON'T CARE what your going through, if you're not dead, he ain't through you yet. As long as you're alive you CAN STILL MAKE IT HAPPEN. As long as there's breath in your nostrils, boo, you're still in the game, you still can win."The post was edited 1 time, last by Aroace ().
-
Tanks bad? i use them and their effective"Success is not final, Failure is NOT fatal. I DON'T CARE if your sick, I DON'T CARE what your going through, if you're not dead, he ain't through you yet. As long as you're alive you CAN STILL MAKE IT HAPPEN. As long as there's breath in your nostrils, boo, you're still in the game, you still can win."
-
Teburu wrote:
lol no
terrible tierlist
only thing it shows is that you dont know shit about con
"Success is not final, Failure is NOT fatal. I DON'T CARE if your sick, I DON'T CARE what your going through, if you're not dead, he ain't through you yet. As long as you're alive you CAN STILL MAKE IT HAPPEN. As long as there's breath in your nostrils, boo, you're still in the game, you still can win." -
This sort of conversation will always fail to reach a useful conclusion because CoN isn't a one-dimensional game and it's units' values / importances can't be measured correctly using a one-dimensional ranking.
You might as well ask, "Which is more useful, a fish or a bicycle?" -
Teburu wrote:
also: don't put melee above B tier;
Commander Zozo001
humble player -
PaskalSF wrote:
[motorized infantry] have to be put on Great especially when lvl 6 they can fire mortars
Commander Zozo001
humble player -
PaskalSF wrote:
Teburu wrote:
lol no
terrible tierlist
only thing it shows is that you dont know shit about con
the fact that you put mbts at the top while talking about „experience“ is pretty telling.
But you want to use „experience“ as an argument?
Okay nice, two can play that game:
I‘m Rank 97, 117 games joined, 47 coalition wins, 28 solo wins, 5.1 K/D, Member of a once prestigious but now inactive alliance, beta tester and officially acknowledged „teacher“ in the discord.
Your Tierlist is bad and you should feel bad.
Simple as that.I am The Baseline for opinions -
My tier list