TheShinwacker wrote:
Just to see if you can really support D4 in a real fight.
But which of D4 accs is the main one?
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
TheShinwacker wrote:
Just to see if you can really support D4 in a real fight.
TheShinwacker wrote:
Just to see if you can really support D4 in a real fight.
The Destroyer 4 wrote:
KFG
Re-visiting old out of date post only slows down the average players forward thinking, it most-likely would drive them in the wrong direction thinking that out of date style will help them win.
I feel like as they read more old threads, they can't create or learn new ideas to benefit them in game.
WednesdayAddams wrote:
I understand building on a thread one or two months old, but when it’s few years old and the info is outdated, it’s time to make a new oneAeneas of Troy wrote:
“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” -Winston Churchill
The post was edited 1 time, last by KFGauss ().
The post was edited 1 time, last by Im On Smoko ().
WednesdayAddams wrote:
Again, y’all are wasting your time.
Kfg is a boomer and ur complaints aren’t gonna change it
TheShinwacker wrote:
If your so adamant about not hearing from KFG anymore(AKA banning him) You could just leave this forum and never come back.
KFGauss wrote:
And - Which existing threads of non-outdated info have you noticed people adding to lately?
And - How often do you see people spamming new threads that ignore existing recent useful information?
This entire whining session is built on a foundation that assumes that anything written more than about 72 hours ago should be ignored, replaced, and repeated.
That's absurd, and reflects a chat-app mindset, not a Threaded Forum mindset.
Don't complain to me if you don't like that I remind people
to exert just the slightest amount of impulse control, and/or
to think twice before spamming posts instead of using people's walls, or using the forum's conversation feature, or using searching (to see if the idea that's been inside their brain for the last five seconds might just possibly NOT be a new perspective, new idea, or new topic), and/or
to stay on topic.
Why shouldn't you complain to me? Because it's not useful, and doing it reflects poorly on the complainer.
japan samurai wrote:
Opinions gets old. People thoughts on a certain subject changes from time to time as they they’re daily life Experiences shape the way they think, they act and the way they perceive things for most part.
A few years old thread nobody is going to search it up or bother about it, everybody wants new threads. New posts new Opinions.
As beginners / noobs read more old threads they would think that strategy would benefit them, however sometimes such old threads are mainly pros / decent players talking with each other. Sure now they know what is the “right” strategy, but would they know how to apply it right to actually feel the same as the pros or would they just Mess up the build and then end up coming back disappointed with the results and go back to melee (ground strat).
The post was edited 1 time, last by TheDeletedElite ().
KFGauss wrote:
That's ridiculous.The Destroyer 4 wrote:
KFG
Re-visiting old out of date post only slows down the average players forward thinking, it most-likely would drive them in the wrong direction thinking that out of date style will help them win.
I feel like as they read more old threads, they can't create or learn new ideas to benefit them in game.
And - Which existing threads of non-outdated info have you noticed people adding to lately?WednesdayAddams wrote:
I understand building on a thread one or two months old, but when it’s few years old and the info is outdated, it’s time to make a new oneAeneas of Troy wrote:
“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” -Winston Churchill
And - How often do you see people spamming new threads that ignore existing recent useful information?
This entire whining session is built on a foundation that assumes that anything written more than about 72 hours ago should be ignored, replaced, and repeated.
That's absurd, and reflects a chat-app mindset, not a Threaded Forum mindset.
Don't complain to me if you don't like that I remind people
- to exert just the slightest amount of impulse control, and/or
- to think twice before spamming posts instead of using people's walls, or using the forum's conversation feature, or using searching (to see if the idea that's been inside their brain for the last five seconds might just possibly NOT be a new perspective, new idea, or new topic), and/or
- to stay on topic.
Why shouldn't you complain to me? Because it's not useful, and doing it reflects poorly on the complainer.
The Destroyer 4 wrote:
The info you show KFG is usually outdated.Its slowing them growing from new opinions are idea'sKFGauss wrote:
And - Which existing threads of non-outdated info have you noticed people adding to lately?
And - How often do you see people spamming new threads that ignore existing recent useful information?
This entire whining session is built on a foundation that assumes that anything written more than about 72 hours ago should be ignored, replaced, and repeated.
That's absurd, and reflects a chat-app mindset, not a Threaded Forum mindset.
Don't complain to me if you don't like that I remind people
to exert just the slightest amount of impulse control, and/or
to think twice before spamming posts instead of using people's walls, or using the forum's conversation feature, or using searching (to see if the idea that's been inside their brain for the last five seconds might just possibly NOT be a new perspective, new idea, or new topic), and/or
to stay on topic.
Why shouldn't you complain to me? Because it's not useful, and doing it reflects poorly on the complainer.
People can go your way if they want KFG, just know it will steer them in the wrong direction for success and slow down there growth.
I'm a progressive man that tries to hear out peoples opinions.
But you're a guy which want everything done the old way, which is bad.
KFG, sanctioning their voices and opinions is only going to discourage them... feeling that their opinion is invalid and they should be under your wing.
The constant spamming of old out of date threads is bad, ya'll elders are like the Catholic church.
While us newbies are the people of the enlightenment.
The Destroyer 4 wrote:
It seems that I have the numerical advantage, but they got more quality on their side.
For @TheShinwacker latest battle post:
The Destroyer 4 wrote:
Why delete your old account.
The World Detroyer isn't my main account. I usually do team alliances on it or, test new strategies in new games.