Are National Guards worth it? Share your strategy here.
“This We'll Defend” - U.S. Army
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
The post was edited 1 time, last by KFGauss ().
bloodysong wrote:
Here a new info
you can use 1 national guards to get city's any more after the last update Rouge start come with full hp(your troops will die )
so you need 2 now and with the price of 2 you may get normal infantry to do the job because thay are cheaper
Ofc you need lvl 2 infantry
bloodysong wrote:
. . . your normal infantry got more use in late game then NG
The post was edited 1 time, last by KFGauss ().
FarmerJG wrote:
Are National Guards worth it? Share your strategy here.
regatta2k16 wrote:
keep the questions coming.FarmerJG wrote:
Are National Guards worth it? Share your strategy here.
It's useful to learn the low-hanging fruit before asking questions - When you do that you don't waste your time or other people's time, and I think that you/I ask better questions and get better answers if our questions are built on a strong foundation of knowledge.
use search only if no one answers your post or if you're not satisfied with the answers.
See previous. Why would anyone advise anyone else to not use factual information from experts that is (immediately) at everyone's fingertips, and instead ask others to fish with dynamite by seeking (and then waiting for) the opinions of randoms? That just baffles me. I can hardly avoid assuming that their motivations and mine aren't the same.
as you can see, people still answer questions (instead of directing you to search) because we are interested in what people think NOW.
Some people might be interested in what people "think", but I usually assume that people who ask questions are interested in how the game mechanics work, and in learning what people "know" about that. YMMV
also don't blindly follow "experienced, highly-successful players" because most of them don't have video proof of how they play
Video? LOLOLOLOL
regarding your question, here's my answer.
It's worth it if it fits your playstyle. Some players who bank on high-level airforce or navy or artillery are content with national guards.
I haven't been using them lately because I try not to log in often so I prefer L6 motorized infantry to conquer inactive/ai cities. I just direct them to go inside the city but not at the center then I will log out.
While I'm offline, they will automatically attack and eliminate what's inside. When I log in again after 6-12 real-time hours, I conquer those cities. Useful especially when I don't have L3 radars nearby.
If the OP wants to know the pros and cons of this approach, I recommend using Google to find past discussions of exactly that approach. They are wide-ranging, are pretty good, and they definitely helped me. They include insights not found in this thread.
The post was edited 2 times, last by KFGauss ().
FarmerJG wrote:
Are National Guards worth it? Share your strategy here.
The post was edited 1 time, last by KFGauss ().
bloodysong wrote:
But if there second one your NG will die
The post was edited 1 time, last by Zozo001 ().
KFGauss wrote:
A) Can someone in a newly started (post-change) game take a look at the Insurgent stats in their game and report what their Insurgents' Atk/Def/Stats are, and
B) If the pre-change and post-change Insurgent stats are the same, am I right when I think that we should tell Dorado that if they wanted to implement a neutral change (no nerfing and no buffing) they missed the target?
Zozo001 wrote:
. . . telling them about this is unlikely to be fruitful.
playbabe wrote:
so they just reduce all insurgent max HP.
2 Guests