I am strongly for 1, 2, and 3, those are all things I have thought about since Day 1 of my first game, lol. Me being OCD and wanting all the information even the irrelevant, 4 would be interesting, but I think the first 3, especially in rp and full games of active players, would be useful/interesting.

Trading units wouldn't be so bad as countries these days trade ARMORED units, i woulnd't be against if you could trade armor on the marked, tho not infantry

Infantry would be very unrealistic. That's be like saying "hey we have 4 green berets, 2 SEALs, and a dozen 101st airborne retiring today, you want em?" But the armored land units, sea units, and air units are constantly changing hands in rl...

how will you deliver units? Teleport them? If not, then you can do it already - by diplomacy screen. What I miss is trading missiles (funny thing is now I can trade/give launcher but not missile :D).

necroing this to save me typing. bartering would be really nice as cash becomes worthless in mid/late game.

Number 1 i love. strategy wise, Your spies can see what a nation bought and sold. Keeping resources and money out of certain players hands is and idea ill get behind.

Number 2. You can trade with players as is. Just PM them lol. If you want a specific resource for another resource you can also sell that resource and then use that money to set a buy price for the other.

Number 3. Using Supremacy 1914 as an example selling units even limited to 10% of your current total is abused like crazy. It also causes bugs that get abused as well (teleporting units to nearest harbour)
-Gameplay vs Realism. Just because something is true does not mean its good in the context of a game. In an role-play setting trading units and missiles is great. But in a non rpg setting youll have competitive players exploiting units to get around upkeep cost focusing on one player, Missiles will be traded to whoever needed it so you have one stockpile for several nations. And all the glitches that come with it can and will be abused.

Number 4. Timestamps is good. i sometimes buy a little of something to raise the max price of an item then sell a bulk of it at a higher price. Good early game cash tactic. Timestamps would allow a visual of when something was bought and sold to notice these tactics. Popularity is obvious: Price is high its popular or rare. Price is Low its common or not popular.
As for producers we got: the Newspaper is shows highest productions yield in Stats.

I suppose your suggesting Market based and more specific. Such as Highest Fuel contributor on the market etc. It would be interesting the title would encourage more trading on the market. and allow players to see who basically controls a certain resource. Have their Country displayed on the market as the number one producer or seller of that resource. (the Component nations would die)

Notes i have on this subject or concerns are as follows.
-Market is a barren wasteland after the first month usually around 3rd week.
Trade focuses on your own coalition asking and passing resources to one another. Good alliances will have roles for the members leading to focus of components for one ad supplies for another.
Nations become independent with the conquest of other nations and cities. Increasing the production around 5x fold with conquest and building upgrades. You can get lucky by putting extremely high offers for some but really the money is being used on spies at this point.

yo i love this idea one of the best i have seen it would put a lot more detail and stradegy into the game

its not worthless, you just have to turn it into spies.

Call it inflation. You just cant buy things anymore. On a market both sided need to benefit to make a deal happen.
Because nobody needs money and therefore nobody is selling anything. in my current game (day 29) I have 40k fuel, 20k electornics and 30 k rares...i could put them an the market....but why should I? I dont need the money anymore so only the buyer would benefit...

Pitty is that even AI is not selling on the market in mid/late game...

Yes, but there should still be a manpower requirements so friendly troops have to enter the vechicles.

Menpower...yeah I have always like 100k leftovers per game....

this is a point we need money to be a thing full game

I would like the see both the agent function and market function updated for more in-depth gameplay.

The unit selling used to be a function, but it was abused and therefore removed.

I wouldn't mind seeing embargo brought back.

Yeah I really want to see trading and market get overhaul.
currently it's limiting as fuck it so difficult to trade with specific person.

abusing bug ? so why not fix it *thinking_emoji*

still want to see cargo truck / cargo ship and trade routes so we can have way to disrupt resource without taking city.

Logistics is a HUGE factor in war. Could be interesting to see something relating to that implemented too.

Point No.3, I like this, I wrote a proposal some time ago to the idea of a black arms market but rejected.



Weapons Black Market:-


forum.conflictnations.com/inde…ns%E2%80%8B-black-market/

I think your ideas are great but have too much potential for abuse.