Back in my historical studies (8 years ago), Wikipedia was still pretty unreliable for precise events, but it has improved. Nowadays, Wikipedia became increasingly sourced and reliable in many of its references, and can be given as an introduction to many topics. Not sufficient for extended studies, but if more people were reading it, some myths and lies about history would be less popular. The Korean war article has an impressive number of 400 sources for citations and a good thirthy bibliographic references, that can be used for source-checking.
Diplomacy, and Politics, are an important part of every conflict, whatever the solution. I imagine that between you two, there is an interpretation gap about what "not solved diplomatically" means : diplomatic solution doesn't imply "bloodless"
On the Korean War Topic, i suppose Last Warrior reffered to the Korean Conflict as a whole, who is indeed, not finished --> there are still two korean entities that have territorial claims on each other. The military phase known as "Korean war" was indeed diplomatically solved, something that can be said for pretty much every military conflict, in the end. Even the Third Reich initiated a conventional diplomatic process after Hitler's suicide, to formalise Germany's capitulation.
India's independance was bloody, as the British DEFINITELY didn't let go without conflict the productive gem of the empire.
And the Cold war is something too complex to be summarised to this simplistic term. Pretty much as "the hundred year war(s)".
Diplomacy, and Politics, are an important part of every conflict, whatever the solution. I imagine that between you two, there is an interpretation gap about what "not solved diplomatically" means : diplomatic solution doesn't imply "bloodless"
On the Korean War Topic, i suppose Last Warrior reffered to the Korean Conflict as a whole, who is indeed, not finished --> there are still two korean entities that have territorial claims on each other. The military phase known as "Korean war" was indeed diplomatically solved, something that can be said for pretty much every military conflict, in the end. Even the Third Reich initiated a conventional diplomatic process after Hitler's suicide, to formalise Germany's capitulation.
India's independance was bloody, as the British DEFINITELY didn't let go without conflict the productive gem of the empire.
And the Cold war is something too complex to be summarised to this simplistic term. Pretty much as "the hundred year war(s)".
Running an online alliance is pretty much like running a small company, except you need to find other way than money to keep your employees productive. May they play or work, they are humans.
