I have been investigating the AFV and if the AFV are all armored vehicles that can be considered tank _ armored car _ self-propelled guns or vehicles for the transport of personnel.
implying this though I know that the AFV in the game are light tanks and whose purpose is to give balance thus giving a more economical and versatile alternative to the main tank.
Now the units that we offer in the Conflicts of nations as AFV are in themselves Vehicles of personnel transport being these used generally by the mechanized infantry in fact could even suggest that these vehicles are added according to the improvements that are made to these units but understanding that each graphic representation of the units in the CoN takes its cost because they are modeled in 3d that are focused from different angles and actions.
So if adding to the AFV they wanted to give a more economical option to the player in front of the main tank because it would not add variants of the main tanks of older generations with a similar performance, for example, instead of a BMP-2 because not more T-64 after the T-72 and following a T-80 and that applies to other doctrines but with different tanks
Plainly and simply they would be giving the player a choice if investing in weapons of new or old generation in exchange for economy or a higher cost due to their performance would make the game a little more attractive than what is immensely already
implying this though I know that the AFV in the game are light tanks and whose purpose is to give balance thus giving a more economical and versatile alternative to the main tank.
Now the units that we offer in the Conflicts of nations as AFV are in themselves Vehicles of personnel transport being these used generally by the mechanized infantry in fact could even suggest that these vehicles are added according to the improvements that are made to these units but understanding that each graphic representation of the units in the CoN takes its cost because they are modeled in 3d that are focused from different angles and actions.
So if adding to the AFV they wanted to give a more economical option to the player in front of the main tank because it would not add variants of the main tanks of older generations with a similar performance, for example, instead of a BMP-2 because not more T-64 after the T-72 and following a T-80 and that applies to other doctrines but with different tanks
Plainly and simply they would be giving the player a choice if investing in weapons of new or old generation in exchange for economy or a higher cost due to their performance would make the game a little more attractive than what is immensely already