Atomic barrel artillery
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
Because Mobile Artillery isn't already one of the strongest units?
Would you need atomic heads to fire the artillery? The can't be shot down, they would make missiles redundant?
Why trying to nuke with a nuke if you can nuke with an artillery? -
i learned something new i didnt know you could fire nuclear artillery shells until now only problem is for the soldiers firing those nuclear shels dying from radiation in 4 or five years
- hello
- hello
-
Actually Russia is pretty much the only remaining nuclear power still holding on to nuke arty. It was a thing in the cold war but stockpiles were destroyed eventually.
And no - we are not planning to include arty nukes. Using CMs for tactical level nukes is safer and already tough enough."Going to war without France is like going hunting without an accordion." Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf -
maybe we can get it as seasonal unitI am The Baseline for opinions
-
Actually Russia is pretty much the only remaining nuclear power still holding on to nuke arty. It was a thing in the cold war but stockpiles were destroyed eventually.
i learned two new things today- hello
- hello
-
Technically both US and USSR/Russia agreed to remove ALL tactical nuclear weapons and destroy them.
Factually there remains a high level of doubt if Russia actually did so - they themselves claim that they kept several thousand tactical Nukes:
"Retention of tactical nuclear weapons in contravention of Presidential Nuclear Initiative - Recent Russian press reports that 3,300-5,700 retained including . nuclear artillery, missile warheads, bombs and cruise missile warheads and suitcase bombs."
From: google.com/url?sa=t&source=web…Vaw363om4ecDMUwOXFk14gq8_"Going to war without France is like going hunting without an accordion." Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf -
wow i another interesting fact
- hello
- hello
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Users Online 1
1 Guest