Carriers seem kinda meh

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Buckeyechamp wrote:

      def not worth bang for buck. imo better off taking a port city with strong navy assualt and/or get an obscure prov via marines build pantoon.. bring in troops to hold than build airifield to fly in rest of troops / airsupport. Problem I see with people using aircraft carriers as people dont realize defensless and dont escort with strong navy force. The planes onboard not enough to protect if i attack with strong frigg force as anti air will eat up their planes. Ive never seen carrier used effectively long term and generally get sunk once you see where path the planes are coming from.
      Carriers have the big benefit of being an mobile airfield that can't be sabotaged, tho since ppl almost never sabotage airfields they loose their worth
      also: "strong frig force" :D frigs suck in navy vs navy combat
      I am The Baseline for opinions
    • Buckeyechamp wrote:

      funny I just sunk multiple destroyer lead stacks and an officer lead stack in current game.
      I can kill frigates with corvetts if i have high enough of tech advantage so whats your point?
      Frigates are weaker than Destroyers in all important aspects of naval warfare; speed, hitpoints, damage and i think they even get their range later
      I am The Baseline for opinions