If you are in a coalition, and ...

Dealer of Death · Apr 16th 2020, 12:15am

If you are in a coalition and you share intelligence with somebody in another coalition, do you see what he sees (his units and territories plus his coalition partners territory and units) and vice versa, or does it just let you see HIS territory and units?

Anyone know?

I've never done this, because I almost never even grant RoW to non coalition countries, but was curious.

Teburu · Apr 16th 2020, 12:31am

only HIS is visible to you
and only YOURS to him

Dealer of Death · Apr 16th 2020, 1:09am

That's awesome, I would hate to compromise my coalition partners if I ever did this.

The Pale Rider · Apr 16th 2020, 1:28am

well you should not be in shared intelligence or any outside relationship without all your coalition aware of it. If i find out someone potential double agent in my coalition; im kicking them.

Robert Ilenfeld · Apr 16th 2020, 1:48am

Agrees with Buckeye

alleongvbc · Apr 16th 2020, 2:07am

i shared right of way and intelligence and learned this guy was plotting a gang attack on me. another player told me (who I was recruiting) and then my paid agents (spies) intercepted an incriminating smoking gun email of my 'trusted ally'. so i waged war and eliminated him from the game. so, if you do give intelligence, be careful and always use agents and gather intel from them and your enemies.

Dealer of Death · Apr 16th 2020, 6:31pm

Buckeyechamp wrote:

well you should not be in shared intelligence or any outside relationship without all your coalition aware of it. If i find out someone potential double agent in my coalition; im kicking them.

Well A.) I'm the leader, so kicking me ain't happening.
and B.) this was more theoretical, but if I did, I would clear it with my allies first because even tho I'm the leader, I don't play dictator, ever.

... C.) one of my coalition partners is already in a non official relationship with this 3rd party, tho not shared intel
... D.) there are way bigger threats in this game. If 3rd party would backstab, that would only hasten the loss for everyone to the 4th party, and all parties know that.

Teburu · Apr 16th 2020, 7:15pm

but to be honest
it's kinda fun if you can just spectate them fighting

The Pale Rider · Apr 16th 2020, 8:26pm

Teburu wrote:

but to be honest
it's kinda fun if you can just spectate them fighting

yeah i had that happen on mideast map as no real coalitions and need to piece together and trust people on shared intelligence. and two guys (they used to be part of our network as Mideast maps seem to get into a north v south thing at least times i played) i had shared intell with both fought each other. but hard not to say anything seeing both sides of a battle and wouldnt do it in a coalition setting.

One game a guy was hiding all these ROW relationships he had with an enemy coalition whom we were in a coalition battle with. Kick hiss ass out and attacked him. I suspected it but then Enemy A was bombing Coalition troops in his city (Coalition traitor) and only killing coalition partner B troops.

Sure if you had pre existing arrangements before joining coalition thats one thing; but just say hey I have ROW with country A we can keep him friendly /neutral and may be able to use down the road. But dont cut side deals with active enemies of your coalition. Thats double agent in my book.

Dealer of Death · Apr 17th 2020, 7:15am

Actually Buckeye, the real scenario I was basing my theoretical question on involves me in a coalition and the guy I was thinking of sharing intel with the 3rd party, not being in a coalition at all.

Is that still a double agent in your book or only a 1.5 agent?

Buckeyechamp wrote:

Teburu wrote:

but to be honest
it's kinda fun if you can just spectate them fighting

yeah i had that happen on mideast map as no real coalitions and need to piece together and trust people on shared intelligence. and two guys (they used to be part of our network as Mideast maps seem to get into a north v south thing at least times i played) i had shared intell with both fought each other. but hard not to say anything seeing both sides of a battle and wouldnt do it in a coalition setting.
One game a guy was hiding all these ROW relationships he had with an enemy coalition whom we were in a coalition battle with. Kick hiss ass out and attacked him. I suspected it but then Enemy A was bombing Coalition troops in his city (Coalition traitor) and only killing coalition partner B troops.

Sure if you had pre existing arrangements before joining coalition thats one thing; but just say hey I have ROW with country A we can keep him friendly /neutral and may be able to use down the road. But dont cut side deals with active enemies of your coalition. Thats double agent in my book.

The Pale Rider · Apr 17th 2020, 3:55pm

as long as you told everyone in the coalition and they were ok with it.. its the secret relationships that tend to get exploited

If you are in a coalition, and ...

If you are in a coalition, and ...

Buckeyechamp wrote:

Teburu wrote:

Buckeyechamp wrote:

Teburu wrote:

Share

Similar Threads